Thursday, July 10, 2008

White Supremacists Are Turning To Islam?

PLEASE NOTE: CURTIS MAYNARD IS MY BITCH. I OWN HIM IN A BIG WAY. HE IS NOTHING BUT A SELF LOATHING COWARD WHO HAS NOT POSTED ONE OF MY LAST 5 OR 6 COMMENTS ON HIS BLOG. I STOPPED GOING TO HIS BLOG BECAUSE OF HIS DETESTATION FOR FREE SPEECH. LIKE MOST JOOOO PARANOID INTERNET CIRCUS FREAKS, HE IS NOTHING BUT A HYPOCRITE AND A CLOWN. HE CAN'T HANDLE THE TRUTH. THE TRUTH SCARES THE FUCK OUT OF HIM.



There is a rumour that Curtis Maynard is a Muslim too. Hmmmm.
Hitler did say that the only religion he respected was Islam according to the freak in the video.

9 comments:

Orion said...

Why should anyone allow a jew to debate? Do jews allow open debate? Like the good book says, "for what fellowship have righteousness and iniquity? or what communion hath light with darkness?"

Or, as another great man once noted:

"The more I argued with them, the better I came to know their dialectic. First they counted on the stupidity of their adversary, and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry, quoted platitudes which, if you accepted them, they immediately related to entirely different matters, and then, if again attacked, gave ground and pretended not to know exactly what you were talking about. Whenever you tried to attack one of these apostles, your hand closed on a jelly-like slime which divided up and poured through your fingers, but in the next moment collected again. But if you really struck one of these fellows so telling a blow that, observed by the audience, he couldn't help but agree, and if you believed that this had taken you at least one step forward, your amazement was great the next day. The Jew had not the slightest recollection of the day before, he rattled off his same old nonsense as though nothing at all had happened, and, if indignantly challenged, affected amazement; he couldn't remember a thing, except that he had proved the correctness of his assertions the previous day.

Sometimes I stood there thunderstruck.

I didn't know what to be more amazed at: the agility of their tongues or their virtuosity at lying."

Sound familiar, Mr. Jewey? Care to "refute" that?

BEAJ said...

You want me to refute rhetoric? How about some real examples?

And the bible? Jesus never existed. It is a book of myths made up a few centuries "after the fact."

I love it when Joooo paranoid internet circus freaks put comments on this blog. Thanks for the morning smile.

Roy Barley said...

"And the bible? Jesus never existed."

I don't know if you're attacking the New Testament, by itself, or the Bible as a whole. It seems odd that a Jewish person would refer to the NT as the Bible.

At any rate, speaking solely from the historical viewpoint, there is much less likelihood that Moses existed.

If you're going to call Jesus a myth, then you surely accept that Jesus stood upon a bull-dung mountain of myth. The Jewish faith is only a scant few centuries older than Christianity, and based solely upon the politically charged fables of Judah and Israel.

These people couldn't decide whether they were worshipping El or Yahweh, so they combined the two.

Moses and Aaron were concoctions, as was Abraham. This is a historical fact. Personal attestations aside, there is more scholarly evidence for the existence of Jesus-- though certainly not for his so-called Divinity.

So, who's sillier? The people who worship the Romanized man-deity, or those who worship the war-god Yahweh Sabaoth?

I say, let's all get a little Mithras.

Orion said...

Says here on your masthead:

"a chance to debunk, refute, chastise, and debate anti-semitic postings".

Of course, you resorted again to something Uncle Wolf pointed out:

"and then, when there was no other way out, they themselves simply played stupid. If all this didn't help, they pretended not to understand, or, if challenged, they changed the subject in a hurry..."

Haha I doubt seriously that Curtis is your bitch. He simply understands the jew.

And that quote wasn't from Jesus. If you going to try to influence the Xtian Zionists you should try reading the bible sometime.

Thanks, Mr. Jewey. And I'll bet your boyfriend knows all about morning smiles :)

BEAJ said...

Roy, I also know Moses didn't exist either. I wrote something on it on my main Atheist Jew blog.
I've written much about the history of Judaism on my blog. I think Judaism didn't exist as the religion we know it as today until around 450 BC.
There is no contemporary evidence for Jesus either. And there should be tons.
Actually, check this link out: Was Moses Really Hammurabi. It has a link to The Bible Unearthed Video series which is really interesting stuff.
As for me referring to the NT or OT as a bible, it is all the same crap to me.

Orion, you have the mind of a child. You gave me nothing but rhetoric to refute. Or are you too braindead to realize it? Bring it on child.

curt maynard said...

RE The BEAJ's commentary:

True enough, I erased all of your comments. Jews and the Jewish POV get no time at my blog. But you already knew that.

BEAJ said...

Maynard, you are a child. Grow up man. Jews and Jew's point of view?
You sound like a three year old. Well, you are a baby. Get over it.

jimbo! said...

OK, jew-boy!....u claim Jesus Christ never existed &, also, that most of the Old Testament stories r just that...."stories": fine!

if this is the case, then could you please answer this: what right do jews have to exist & what right does Israel have to be a 'nation'?

Baconeater said...

Just because the history of any religion is most improbable (especially with the supernatural stuff that supposedly went on), doesn't mean that believers don't make things happen based on their beliefs.
Very simply with Israel, as anti semitism made it so Jews were not treated as equals in many cases, a place for Jews to escape was sought.
Judaism was borne in Israel though, even though it was created under false assumptions (like every religion), so it was always the holiest place known to Jews throughout modern history.
The fact is that the Palestine region was not sovereign territory, just like the Americas were not sovereign territory when the Pilgrims came over to also escape some sort of persecution in Europe.
All countries are formed by negotiations or war. There was no country where a Jewish majority state was wanted.
Israel was formed as legally as any country on this planet. And yes, might makes right usually determines sovereignty. If the Arabs won any of the wars since 1948, the Jews in the region would be Dhimmis at best.