Friday, June 1, 2007

I Love Mocking Joooo Paranoid Imbeciles

Life is great. Pardon my laryngitis. I sound like one of Marge Simpsons sisters.

I put some new links on my sidebar. Check out "Joooo Paranoid Imbeciles" for Joooo paranoid imbeciles.

There are two main types of people in the world: those who strive for success while taking responsibility for their own actions while understanding they are responsible for their own lot in life, and those who blame Joooos for their pathetic lot in life.

The Joooo paranoid freaks in my links are pathological mental cases. It is funny how they blame Joooos for being too capitalistic while also blaming Joooos for being communists. Shmurtis Maynard blamed Jooooos recently for the death of a white couple at the hands of a group of blacks. They will go to tremendous extremes to blame Joooos for everything. It is quite comical.

That being said, I think free speech is great. The internet, for example, puts these imbeciles out there sort of like Barnum and Bailey circus freaks, to be seen and heard by anyone with a computer on the internet. Rational people are either disgusted by them or just laugh hysterically at them. I prefer to laugh.

I used to be for jailing freaks like Ernst Zundel. Not anymore, let the freaks talk.
I have confidence that the truth will prevail. It was harder before, without the internet. But now, imbeciles like Wombat, Mark Glenn, and Maynard just represent the lunatic fringe. They were even able to muster up 35 people in Washington a few weeks ago to protest Zundel's jail sentence. It must suck big time to be them.

13 comments:

Gert said...

Marge Simpson's sisters are Jooooish???? Holy moly, they're everywhere... (lol)

Seriously, these comical whackjobs are not really worth our time, they should get a life and a hobby. Someone like Sentinel though, is more dangerous. He's deadly serious about his anti-Semitism and Holocaust revisionism and he's got the "facts" to prove it!

BEAJ said...

Gert, Marge and her sisters are voiced by Julie Kasner who is a Jew. She was also the sister on Rhoda, Brenda Morgenstern.

Sentinel and the rest share the same Joooo paranoia, and have convinced themselves they are preaching "the truth." They all say they are not obsessed by Joooos and that they don't "hate" Joooos, though by their definitions they hate almost every Joooo.
They are not dangerous. Sentinel might get 20 hits a day on his website tops, and most are by those who oppose his deluded views.
To me, they are just internet circus freaks, who only deserve to be mocked.
They are in the same category as those who support the Creationist Museum. Just shake your head and giggle.

Gert said...

Don't you dare mock the Creationist Museum, d'ya hear! This is a prime educational facility for YEC yokels... Essential viewing for home-schoolers that want to breed more morons...

The Sentinel said...

I am only dangerous beca#use my view opposes yours.

And yes, there are plenty of facts to support the contentions, but of course, we back to that old chestnut of no readers / 20 readers.

The truth is, and tell if I am wrong and why, but you have no idea how many readers I have do you?

You are gauging it by the comment box presumably, but silence is merely affirmation and the comment boxes of this blog and most others are filled with the comments of a handful of regulars, not hundreds of unique readers.

In fact, I have had hundreds upon hundreds of visitors from the US seeking information on the Knoxville massacre, just one subject line.

I have told you before, I do not hate you at all, I don't even know you, what I object to is the machination and games of the relatively few who happen to be of the same ethnicity as yourself, and I only publish what I can verify credibly.

BEAJ said...

No Sentinel, you are not dangerous. You are merely a Joooo obsessed internet circus freak.

There are no facts to support the Protocols bs, that "you don't know if it is true," so don't give me the crap that you only post stuff that is verifiable. Your definition is that if you read it in a journal or the internet and it maligns Joooos, then it is verifiable and print worthy on your blog.

I have a sitemeter. Maybe you should put one up, to prove me wrong.

I doubt you get more than 20 hits a day.

My Judeophobe blog is new, it gets around 30-50 hits a day. My atheist blog gets 250-300 hits a day....many are google search hits.

Again, you can find games and machination performed by many a white but you choose to focus on the Joooo. And again, you will buy into any conspiracy story that maligns Joooos, even if it is most probably untrue.

The Sentinel said...

I have never mentioned the 'protocols' at all, and I generally use news agencies as sources, mainly Jewish ones at that.

The machinations I speak of lead to war and mayhem, and world wide misery, that is why it is so important.

I am not dangerous, nor is anyone else saying the same thing, but the truth just might be.

Gert said...

Sent:

The visitor numbers may not be relevant but I know enough about Internet marketing and advertising to know how hard it is to get visitors to one in millions of blogs, especially if that blog in question is unlinked to.

If you had more visitors you'd get an awful lot more people opposing your paranoid "views". Much (not all) of what you write is so risible it merits no response but that wouldn't stop people. You also quote from self-aggrandising nincompoops like Fjordman who's such an imbecile he has to appeal to the loony ultra-far American Right to get some readership. An imbecile with no education worth speaking who prattles on like a pseudo-historian, neither helped nor hindered by any real knowledge. But quack as if you know something and even greater imbeciles will believe you... That's Fjordman's game. In reality he's just another airheaded racist.

BEAJ said...

Sentinel, you have mentioned in comments that you don't know if the protocols are true. That is a reflection of the investigations that you do. With any open mind investigations you will know that they are not true or even close to true.

There are 6.5 million people on the planet today. 13 million are Jews. There are no secret meetings. The influence in wars that you over attribute to Jews is just really Western values versus non Western values. What normally is good for Jews on the planet is good for mankind, white people included.

The war in Iraq isn't about Israel. If Israel or Jews were calling the shots, the US would have invaded Saudi Arabia or Iran instead.
It was about radical Islam versus the West. The US had to show Islam that they are not all talk. It was eventual to happen. And it happened in Iraq.

You really don't think the Arab oil lobby is more powerful than Aipac?
What Israel stands for is the West versus a dangerous culture that is stuck in the 12th Century.

The Sentinel said...

gert,

fjordman is a very intelligent columnist who has ben feted as a blogger of merit by many, and is not racist at all, unless you include self-preservation and interest in that silly little label you love to throw around.

He is not appealing to anyone for readership- and he does it out of altruism rather then for remuneration so it would have no impact on him one way or another just how many people viewed it. He does it, as I do, because we can see where all of this is going: Disaster, absolute disaster; countries that enjoyed centuries of homogenous peace will become raging infernos that will equal or surpass conflicts like Bosnia.

As for his education and views, or mine, you are merely resorting to your favourite pastime of baseless insults and smears; you are unable to refute his, or my writings in rational factuality and always just stoop to stock-in-trade glib phrases such as 'you are mentally ill' or 'this is rubbish', etc.

The truth is that you not equipped to debate with the likes of fjordman or I. He would run rings around your silly shallow contentions and angry rants, as I have.

And as for racist, you are the one who correlates a picture of monkeys with black people.


beaj,

Why on earth would Israel instigate an invasion of Saudi Arabia when it is already occupied by the US?

Iraq (and now Iran) were the only viable threats to Israeli security in the region. And we know Iraq is out, and so will be Iran shortly.

We also know that Jewish organisations contribute over half of the donations to the US presidential campaign funds, and as you pointed out, they comprise a fraction of the populace. All that money for nothing?

We know that the 'Lavon affair' was a standard Mossad false flag operation, detonating bombs and blaming Arabs for it, in order to draw the US into doing its bidding- we know that has happened before, only because they were caught red handed. We know that Mossad engineered the US bombing of Libya and we know that the attack on the USS Liberty was a ploy to draw the US into another war on Israels side.

So we know that Israel and Mossad is the master of false flag set-ups, and then we find that Mossad had 120 agents in the US just prior to 9-11 and you don't think that some people will legitimately wonder why, and given the Israeli history fear the worst?

After all, it was only Jewish secret service agents found, and in those tremendous numbers.

As for the 'protocols', what kind of investigation do you suggest I carry out, after all this time, and possibly limited resources, to conclusively prove anything, when the debate still rages?

As I have said, I very much doubt their authenticity as billed, but I don't know for sure who wrote them, when, where and exactly why, and neither do you.

BEAJ said...

Why on earth would Israel instigate an invasion of Saudi Arabia when it is already occupied by the US?
****************
Saudi Arabia is the major funding of terrorism in the middle east I believe, or maybe Syria. Either of those are larger threats to Israel than Iraq was 5 years ago.
You can tell how occupied Saudi Arabia is by the US by the amount of churches there. The terrorists from 9/11 grew up there.

We know that the 'Lavon affair' was a standard Mossad false flag operation, detonating bombs and blaming Arabs for it, in order to draw the US into doing its bidding- we know that has happened before, only because they were caught red handed. We know that Mossad engineered the US bombing of Libya and we know that the attack on the USS Liberty was a ploy to draw the US into another war on Israels side.
******************************
Idiots like you know the Liberty attack was a false flag operation. Of course you buy into the bull. And just because the Lavon affair was questionable, doesn't mean that false flag operations have happened since.
We know the US nukes Japan....


Sharon warned the USA that something was up. Based on their intelligence. Has any of the Mossad agents gone to trial like Pollard did?

We also know that Jewish organisations contribute over half of the donations to the US presidential campaign funds, and as you pointed out, they comprise a fraction of the populace. All that money for nothing?
***************************
Insurance lobbies,HMO lobbies, tobacco lobbies, religious rights lobbies, oil lobbies, etc all contribute large sums, and all of them get consideration. But Aipac contributions are small in comparison if you ever sat down and looked at them. The reality is the US does what is best for themselves but the US represents Western ideals usually when they make a large decision.

I already linked how the protocols started and who was responsible for first writing them. Do you not go to links I provided? See my post on the Protocols. And try to read it through.


Anyway, I am bored with you. You have proved to me you are a Joooo obsessed internet circus freak who buys into any bullshit against Joooos if it has even a remote chance of being true.

Gert said...

Sentinel:

"fjordman is a very intelligent columnist who has ben feted as a blogger of merit by many, and is not racist at all, unless you include self-preservation and interest in that silly little label you love to throw around."

Fjordman is an imbecile who gets read and quoted only by the lunatic far right Internet fringe of which you are a fully paid up member. No one takes this guy seriously except for that sordid little club of "preservationists", white-supremacists, Neonazis, Islamophobes and people like Paul Belien (BrusselsJournal). I've read quite a few of his ramblings and they're simply not worth refuting. It makes me break out in fits of laughter. Badly written, jingoistic, hysterical nonsense which only square heads like you are in awe of. Refuting most of your delusions would be like fitting wheels to a tomato: time-consuming and utterly useless.

I could pose as another Fjordman (t'Interwebs is full of idiots like you and him) and I'd get some following too. There are people who want to believe in anything, including reptillians.

"The truth is that you not equipped to debate with the likes of fjordman or I. He would run rings around your silly shallow contentions and angry rants, as I have."

The truth is that you have difficulty stringing two decent sentences together, as does your friend Fjordie. Just like him you're a self-aggrandizing idiot, paranoid to the brim and someone who buys into any conspiracy theory going. You have no historical perspective whatsoever and neither does Fjordie. A few factoids here, a bit of fabrication there, revive an old croc and hooops, you've got a new theory. Your worldview is a pot-pourri of factoids, loosely bound together by a nonsensical narrative.

You once flirted with National Socialism and it's proving a habit that's hard to break.

Your Little White Inge-land will never happen. You'll die trying... You sad git.

You're an anti-Semite, a Holocaust revisionist, a racist and a homophobe. All you've got is blaming "political correctness". Stand up and be a man and accept your convictions, instead of hiding behind something like PC which isn't even that important.

I couldn't give a crap that you consider my critiquing of you as nothing but insults. I don't talk to Flat-Earthers either. Scorn, insults, tar and feathers is all that you deserve...

As regards your "growing numbers", the likes of you, politically speaking, couldn't organise a piss-up in a brewery. Toothless and clawless blowhard imbeciles that will occasionally resort to violent thuggery, that's all you might ever achieve...

The Sentinel said...

Quite amusing having a Belgian telling me that my England will never exist.

Belgium, the centre for European pedophiles.

Like I said, your all hot air and no substance. Your not capable of anything other then angry little insults and jibes.

When Europe starts imploding, you will be the first to cry for help.

Gert said...

And a Europhobe too. Don't forget to renew your membership of the most ridiculous party in all of Europe, UKIP. Or perhaps you're more into Veritas?

As regards Europe imploding, I wouldn't hold my breath. On second thought, please do...