Canadian Professor Is Either Lying Or Clueless

Questions for Professor Dossa: Were there any Holocaust survivors in attendance during the Iran love-in you attended? And secondly, do you know what illiterate means? Third, if you can't handle the fact that it is Muslims who are responsible for most terror that occurs in the 21st Century, and the West tends to point this out, why don't you leave the West?

December 15th, 2005
"They have created a myth in the name of the Holocaust and consider it above God, religion and the prophets,"...In Western countries, "if someone were to deny the existence of God . . . and deny the existence of prophets and religion, they would not bother him," Ahmadinejad said. "However, if someone were to deny the myth of the Jews' massacre, all the Zionist mouthpieces and the governments subservient to the Zionists tear their larynxes and scream against the person as much as they can."

“Thanks to people’s wishes and God’s will the trend for the existence of the Zionist regime is downwards and this is what God has promised and what all nations want…Just as the Soviet Union was wiped out and today does not exist, so will the Zionist regime soon be wiped out”
(Comments to Iran’s Holocaust Conference)

"Israel is destined for destruction and will soon disappear"
Israel is "a contradiction to nature, we foresee its rapid disappearance and destruction."

October 19, 2006

"Israel must be wiped off the map … The establishment of a Zionist regime was a move by the world oppressor against the Islamic world . . . The skirmishes in the occupied land are part of the war of destiny. The outcome of hundreds of years of war will be defined in Palestinian land."
(In an address to 4,000 students at a program titled, 'The World Without Zionism')
June 19, 2005

The Explanation We Never Heard

Six months after attending a controversial Tehran conference, a Canadian professor charges the media and his own university with ignorance and intolerance.

AN ESSAY
By Shiraz Dossa

========
FULL TEXT
========

It would be a shocking event in any university. It was doubly so in a university that takes pride in its “Catholic character.” Last December, St. Francis Xavier University in Antigonish, Nova Scotia, authorized a small Spanish Inquisition of its own to denounce a St. FX Muslim professor. It was launched by two Jewish professors and the Christian chair of the political science department (Michael Steinitz, Samuel Kalman and Yvon Grenier). My sin: I attended a conference in a Muslim nation on the Holocaust entitled The Review of the Holocaust: Global Vision. It took place in Tehran, Iran, in December 2006, and it was widely—and erroneously—described in the western media as a “Holocaust-denial conference.”

I have never denied the Holocaust, only noted its propaganda power. Yet my university tolerated this assault on me. I was stunned by the university’s illiteracy and bias. I was appalled by President Sean Riley’s attack on my reputation and his spurious comments on the conference. In his December 13, 2006, statement he insinuated that the “conference” was bogus and that it revealed a “deplorable anti-Semitism” that the “St. FX community” found “deeply abhorrent” and contrary to its “traditions.” Riley left little doubt that I was guilty of sullying my school’s reputation. St. FX in effect sanctioned a crusade against a Muslim Holocaust scholar, who also happens to be an outspoken critic of Israel’s brutality in occupied Palestine.

What follows is my view of the events of last December, and my interpretation of the responses to them in the media and at my university.

Two Fallacies
The anti-intellectual storm at St. FX was driven by two fallacies pushed by the media and the literati. The first is that Iran’s president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, has dismissed the Holocaust as a “myth” and threatened to “wipe Israel off the map.” In fact, Ahmadinejad has not denied the Holocaust or proposed Israel’s liquidation; he has never done so in any of his speeches on the subject (all delivered in Farsi/Persian). As an Iran specialist, I can attest that both accusations are false. U.S. Iran experts such as Juan Cole and UK journalists such as Jonathan Steele have come to the same conclusion.1

As Cole correctly notes, Ahmadinejad was quoting the Ayatollah Khomeini in the specific speech under discussion: what he said was that “the occupation regime over Jerusalem should vanish from the page of time.”2 No state action is envisaged in this lament; it denotes a spiritual wish, whereas the erroneous translation—“wipe Israel off the map”—suggests a military threat. There is a huge chasm between the correct and the incorrect translations. The notion that Iran can “wipe out” U.S.-backed, nuclear-armed Israel is ludicrous.

What Ahmadinejad has questioned is the mythologizing, the sacralization, of the Holocaust and the “Zionist regime’s” continued killing of Palestinians and Muslims. He has even raised doubts about the scale of the Holocaust. His rhetoric has been excessive and provocative. And he does not really care what we in the West think about Iran or Muslims; he does not kowtow to western or Israeli diktat. Such questioning and criticism are not new: Jewish scholars such as Adi Ophir, Ilan Pappe, Boas Evron, Tom Segev and Uri Davis have been doing it for two decades. None of this is Holocaust denial.

The second western fallacy is that the event was a Holocaust-denial conference because of the presence of a few notorious western Christian deniers/skeptics, a couple of a neo-Nazi stripe. It was nothing of the sort. It was a Global South conference convened to devise an intellectual/political response to western-Israeli intervention in Muslim affairs. Holocaust deniers/skeptics were a fringe, a marginal few at the conference. The majority of the papers focused on the use and abuse of the Holocaust in Arab, Muslim, Israeli and western politics, a serious and worthy subject for international academic discussion.

Out of the 33 conference paper givers, 27 were not Holocaust deniers, but were university professors and social science researchers from Iran, Jordan, Algeria, India, Morocco, Bahrain, Tunisia, Malaysia, Indonesia and Syria. In attendance were five rabbis (anti-Zionist rabbis, to be sure) who agreed with Rabbi Dovid Weiss of New York that Israel’s occupation policy was “evil” and un-Jewish, and the Holocaust could never justify it—but who insisted, like me, that the Holocaust was a reality. None of us knew that a few deniers/skeptics would be in attendance. This is not at all unusual in the Islamic world. In southern conferences, one rarely knows who will be appearing until one gets there.

The Iranian Institute of Political and International Studies (IPIS), an elite school of advanced politics and policy studies that offers MA and PhD programs, sponsored the Iran conference. It was not sponsored by the Iranian president Dr. Ahmadinejad; he did not attend or participate in the conference. It was not a Holocaust-denial conference by any stretch. That’s all false.

President Riley and his supporters at St. FX bought the denial fallacy that had been concocted by the Simon Wiesenthal Center and the Jewish Defense League, and peddled by media outlets such as The Globe and Mail. On December 11, 2006, the Simon Wiesenthal Center sent out a condemning press release about “Iran’s Holocaust Denial Conference” to news media in the U.S. and Canada.3 It was the Zionists and the neo-Nazis who, for very different, self-serving reasons, depicted it as a Holocaust-denial conference and sold it to willing, anti-Iranian Islamophobes.

Comparative Appearances
Coincidentally, on December 11, 2006, Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice officially welcomed Israel’s Deputy Prime Minister, Avigdor Lieberman, to Washington on behalf of the U.S. government. Lieberman also met Senator Hillary Clinton and ex-President Bill Clinton. The Americans were not at all troubled by their guest’s stance on the Palestinians. Avigdor Lieberman is committed to ridding Israel of its Arabs—in effect, to ethnic cleansing. In the Israeli media (Ha’aretz), he has openly been labelled a racist and a fascist. U.S. critics have called him the Israeli David Duke.

Canada silently acquiesced in Lieberman’s inclusion in the Israeli cabinet. And in January 2007 Peter MacKay addressed the Herzliya Conference in Israel affirming Canada’s attachment to “freedom and democracy,” “values” that “make Canada and Israel so close.” He was there in his official capacity as Canada’s foreign minister. MacKay refused to meet with the leaders of the new elected Palestinian government (Hamas). The government of Canada is not concerned that an anti-Arab ethnic cleanser is Israel’s deputy prime minister. Canadians do hypocrisy rather well.

Consider also, in this connection, an event held at St. FX in September 2006, just three months before the Tehran conference. St. FX and the Religious Studies Department hosted a conference on Catholic-Jewish dialogue. One of the invited speakers was Rabbi Richard Rubenstein, a “distinguished” academic, according to his hosts. He did little to advance the Catholic-Jewish dialogue.

Instead, he launched a vicious attack on Islam, its Prophet and Muslims in the West as a fifth column corroding Christian civilization from within. The good rabbi declared that “genocide” and the “murder” of non-Muslims lay at the heart of Islam. Rubenstein seemed to believe his views would be well received. And apparently they were—by the largely Catholic-Christian audience.

St. FX chancellor Bishop Raymond Lahey and I were on the response panel; I condemned Rubenstein’s anti-Muslim tirade and his labelling of Islam as “Islamo-Fascism,” which in my view is as offensive, racist and false as denying the Holocaust. Bishop Lahey, in his comment, said nothing about Rubenstein’s anti-Islamism. This was a St. Francis Xavier University conference that occurred with the blessing of university president Riley and university chancellor Bishop Lahey, and St. FX provided a public platform to an anti-Muslim, anti-Iranian racist rabbi. My point in making the comparison is that this was still a scholarly, enlightening conference although tainted by Rubenstein’s hate-speech. So was the Iran conference on the Holocaust, although tainted by the presence of a few western, Christian Holocaust deniers.

Islamophobia
So how and why did this attack on my reputation occur?

The Globe and Mail fired the initial shot in its editorial on December 13, 2006. It was followed by a declaration of war on me by its “pundits” John Ibbitson and Rex Murphy, dilettantes extraordinaire on the Holocaust and the Middle East. Neither of these journalists has credibility in either field. Ibbitson hectored me in his usual CNN mode, got most things wrong and casually libelled me in the process.4 Since 9/11, he hasn’t let up on Islam or Muslims. Murphy, in his column “Eichmann in Tehran,” displayed his cerebral deficits and his ignorance of Islam, Iran and Hannah Arendt with enviable facility.5 Like Ibbitson, Murphy impresses those intellectually just a cut above the Trailer Park Boys. It is worth noting that these Christian boys have unlimited latitude in The Globe and Mail to trash Muslims even as they defend “civilization,” Israel and Jews.

My university joined the assault on me forthwith. Chancellor Lahey assured The Globe and Mail’s readers, in his letter to the editor on December 14, 2006, that the conference and my attendance were “contrary” to the “[promotion of] truth” and indeed “worthy of contempt.” It is significant that Riley and Lahey have no scholarly expertise on Islam, Iran or the Holocaust either. I believe they wanted to assure the white, mainstream Canadian community, including Canadian Jews, that “Catholic” St. FX was on their side, and this desire far outweighed their obligation to defend academic freedom. Since I was in Iran as a Holocaust expert, and not representing St. FX or Catholics, I found this a bizarre response. Are Riley and Lahey at the helm of a university committed to the academic freedom of its entire faculty, which includes Muslims? Or is St. FX’s hyped “inclusiveness” only for Christians and Jews? I have been a St. FX professor for 18 years, a full professor since 1996.

Was it an accident that I was swarmed—by petition—by Jewish and Christian professors, with the blessing of St. FX’s Catholic leaders? The petition oddly defended my “academic freedom … to espouse any views that he pleases,” but then negated my right to do so by being “profoundly embarrassed by his participation in the Holocaust-denial conference held in Tehran.” It garnered a fair number of signatures from current and retired professors—about 24 percent of the total faculty at St. FX. But surely these righteous folks are not racist? Surely this could not happen at St. FX, a Catholic institution with its Coady International Institute tradition of decency? It is crucial to stress that many townspeople were incensed by St. FX’s behaviour, among them Miles Tompkins, a direct descendant of Coady’s founder, J.J. Tompkins, and of Moses Coady. In a letter to the local paper, The Casket, on March 21, he chastised St. FX’s conduct and also noted that my “political science department’s response was an embarrassment to the University.”

Was this then an un-Christian lapse, an un-Catholic aberration? It would seem not. We tend to forget that Catholic anti-Semitism has always had two strands, anti-Muslim and anti-Jewish. The anti-Jewish strand has been dominant in western culture for several centuries. In the post-Holocaust period, however, the anti-Muslim strand, which survived the Crusades, got a new lease on life and quickly superseded anti-Jewish anti-Semitism for obvious reasons. As a result, Muslims now bear the brunt of western anti-Semitism and Islamophobia is de rigueur in the liberal Christian West, in support of our war on the “Axis of Evil,” including Iran. The anti-Iranian, anti-Muslim current at St. FX is not accidental; it is the distilled voice of Canadian Islamophobia in these times.

Final Thoughts
Universities are places of discontent; they provoke disputes, they offer critiques of conventional and, often, false views. A university that tailors its teaching and research to the prejudices of its alumni or corporate backers is a travesty. Academic freedom is not conditional on the approval of the university or of university colleagues. Nor is the reputation of the university as an institution tied to the scholarly focus of its faculty or to the controversial subjects that faculty may pursue in their field of expertise.

Iran’s elites have protected Jews since Cyrus ruled West Asia. Anti-Semitism is a Euro-American problem, not an Islamic one. Iranian opposition to Israel and its wars on Muslims/Palestinians is ethical and political; it has absolutely nothing to do with hating Jews qua Jews. It is a great pity that Sean Riley and Bishop Lahey ignored St. FX’s motto, an injunction to first ascertain Quaecumque Sunt Vera, Whatsoever Things Are True, and instead tolerated the assault by St. FX’s ignorant crusaders on the reputation of their Muslim colleague.

I would be remiss if I failed to note that two St. FX officials behaved honourably, with the kind of Catholic decency that befits our university, throughout the course of this episode of academic McCarthyism. Academic Vice-President Dr. Mary McGillivray and the Dean of Arts, Dr. Steven Baldner, tackled the controversy with integrity and respect for the liberal values that St. FX symbolizes. As well, the Canadian Association of University Teachers (CAUT) strongly supported my academic freedom. In his letter to The Globe and Mail on December 14, 2006 (which the paper did not print), Executive Director Jim Turk stated that “academic freedom is to protect the right of academic staff to speak the truth as they see it without repression from their institution, the state, religious authorities, special interest groups or anyone else.”6

THE STORMFRONT MANIFESTO HAS BEEN DISCOVERED

Finally, there is proof that Jew paranoid self loathing imbeciles, who are members of Stormfront have a guideline. Their commandments if you will. Apparently David Duke wrote them while he did his latest stint in prison. He obviously found some time, in between servicing Bubba to complete the Stormfront Manifesto.

Organized Jewry Headquarters (OJH) in Moose Jaw has sent me a copy for blog review. I am honored to be the first person allowed outside of headquarters to read and to comment on the Manifesto. The Manifesto pretty much tells all Stormfront members how to think, act, and react, and most importantly, how to attempt to gain control of the world from the Jews.

CHAPTER ONE: THE STORMFRONT (ARYAN) LIFESTYLE
This chapter outlines things like food, drink, and sex. For example, "never order out from a Chinese Food store because Jews order out a lot." And "never eat inside a Chinese Restaurant because the Chinese Restaurants that aren't owned by Jews, give big discounts to Jews who eat there." "You can only eat Chinese food in food courts in non business sections of cities. You can't eat bagels, not even plain bagels with bacon and cheese."
When it comes to sex, "you can only have sex with white women." "Most white women will give you a hard time for being a racist, but there is always a special white woman who will be your bride. She'll probably weigh a lot more than you like, but she is white, and you have to keep the race pure. Of course, in the mean time,practicing on your mom and sisters is always advisable, just don't tell anyone, and if you sister or mom threatens to open their mouths about it, you can punch them in the face until they forget about it. If you get your sister or mom pregnant, put the child up for adoption as soon as it is born, and make sure that a white couple wind up adopting it."
"Whatever happens behind bars though, stays behind bars. You may grow very close to a black man, or two, or three, in prison, but remember, that it is because you weren't allowed conjugal visits from your mom or sisters. That black man will rob and steal from you once you are out of the can. Just remember that. He didn't love you."
"Beer is very important. Make sure you get a good factory job away from Jews that will at least keep you in beer money. Unfortunately, many Stormfront members lose their jobs because of their love for beer. Welfare doesn't allow you to drink as much beer as you'd like, that is why God Almighty invented Meth and airplane glue."

CHAPTER TWO: WHO IS A JEW
This chapter defines Jews as anyone who is in power, anyone who supports Israel, anyone on TV who isn't black, anyone who owns a store, anyone who has an IQ over 100, and/or anyone who turns you down for a loan.
"It is important to understand that all Jews are brought up to hate non Jews, and especially Aryans. Remember, they are all taught the Talmud by their parents and their Jew teachers. Parents tuck in Jew children to bed by reading them chapters of the Protocols of Zion every night." "All quarter and most one eighth Jews are taught the same thing."

CHAPTER THREE: GAINING CONTROL FROM THE JEWS
David Duke admits this is tough one because most of the time Stormfront members are too drunk or high on meth to be an affective cohesive group. "What is most important is to blame the Jew for anything and everything nasty that goes on in your personal life and the entire world. It doesn't matter if you can't find a Jewish connection, you must invent one. And you must stick with it. Never blame anyone else. Even if you see proof to the contrary, it is best to ignore it, or you will eventually become putty in the Jew's hands." "Example: 9/11- The Jews, Iraq- The Jews, Kennedy assassination- The Jews, Global Warming- The Jews, High gas prices- The Jews. See? It is easy once you practice a little. You don't even have to present proof, and if you need proof, Stormfront has agents on the internet who set up websites to back you up. Again, ignore contrary evidence, the more you question, the more you become a Jew."
"Eventually, if you blame the Jews enough, the world will believe you, and the Jews will no longer be in control."

CHAPTER FOUR: SET UP FALSE ALLIANCES WITH ARABS
This chapter gives the OK to loathe Arabs, but not in public, not until Israel disappears. Until then, the Arab is to be supported. Use quotes from Arab websites to blame the Jews. They will use quotes from Stormfront too. "Once Stormfront gets rid of the Jews, the Arabs will be easy to take down, because they think we are their friends."

CHAPTER FIVE: NEVER ADMIT THIS MANIFESTO EXISTS
David Duke is very paranoid that the Stormfront Manifesto would fall into the publics eye. He devotes an entire chapter on telling his readers to deny it exists, or if shown it, call it an obvious forgery of Jewish fantasy. Even though, what is written in the Manifesto is impossible to deny, "you must deny that you read it."


Oh, and us Jews can laugh our asses off at the Stormfront imbeciles very easily. They are to be laughed at. That is their purpose on this planet. They are our court jesters. We own them big time. We are on their "brains" 24/7:

911 Zionist Bastards Protocols Of Zion

Honestly, I don't get why Joooo paranoid freaks keep coming back to the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. It is mind boggling.

It is an obvious anti-semitic rewrite of a satirical piece, Dialogue in Hell Between Machiavelli and Montesquieu, by Maurice Joly. But it is still used as supposed damning material by White Supremacist retards, Muslims, and most of the backward Arab countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Syria....yeah all of the Muslim countries are backward in the middle east.

Here is the thing: Do these imbeciles think that there are special Joooo meetings that happen a few times a year? Who is invited? How long have they been meeting and where are these meetings? Are the Protocols in almost every Jooooish household? Do our parents teach us the Protocols, or is there Protocol school? Maybe they think it is taught in Hebrew school.

It isn't hard for a Joooo to appear to succeed while these imbeciles are stubbing their toes and blaming Joooos and the Protocols for it.

Watch and listen to what a complete retard sounds like:



UPDATE, I just received a message on Youtube from this LUNATIC (My questions to him are in quotations):

"Do these imbeciles think that there are special Joooo meetings that happen a few times a year?"

Bilderburg
Skull and bones
Freemasons
CFR
Trilateral Commission
AIPAC
Mossad
FBI
CIA
MI6

"Who is invited?"
Zionist billionaires Media owners. All kinds of people are invited. Its works like the military. Everyone only knows what they need to do their job. Jews and Gentiles are part of it but the very top don't care about anyone Jews or Gentiles.

How long have they been meeting and where are these meetings? Started in 1897

"Are the Protocols in almost every Jooooish household?"

No. The protocols have been updated and are only available to a very small number of the top people of the Illuminati. Some members of the ******* family and some other super rich Zionists. The world is controlled by money. Who owns all the central banks? Who controls the money supply?


"Do our parents teach us the Protocols, or is there Protocol school? Maybe they think it is taught in Hebrew school?"

No. Maybe 5 people in the world know about the real updated Protocols. These Zionists are super rich and keep their money hidden. They will kill Jews and Gentiles if they will get more money and more power. They think they are Gods. Genesis 332. The Jews are their chosen people but they will kill their own if they benefit.

Chris Womak, Sniveling Coward

Just a real quick update. As expected and the reason for this blog, Chris Wombat proved the truth is his enemy.
I left 4 comments on his blog, and he only posted one, where I said that if Sarkozy's mother was in fact a Jew, then Sarkozy is an ethnic Jew.
Doing further research, I found that his maternal grandmother was a Christian. Her last name was Bouvier, and she was the reason his grandfather converted.
Sarkozy is not a Jew, which means that the whole article he posted on his blog by Shmurtis Maynard is pointless bullshit.
Funny thing, is Maynard accuses me of lying, because I supposedly knew Sarkozy is a Jew. He is not. Neither by religion or ethnicity.
These guys are paranoid nut bags, and the best is that Womak the wimpy boy, wasn't man enough to post my comments.
There are comments on his blog that accuse me of saying things I didn't say by someone named "anonymous." He posted those lies about me, no problem.

These white trash retards are deceptive, lying fools.

I love the fact that their irrational hatred and paranoia has put them in a no win situation. They say just about anyone in control has Jooooish blood. This implies that they study the Talmud and the Protocols ROFLMAO. I can't help it, I'm laughing as I write this. This way they can state that Joooos are in control, since everyone in control has a bit of Jooooish blood. If they are right, then half the Western world are Joooos. But on the other hand, they say THE TIDE IS TURNING, yet Joooos in their eyes, like Sarkozy get elected in France of all places. Yep, THE TIDE IS TURNING. These idiots really need to get a life.

Oh, and the Maynard story got linked at Rense.

Rense is a place moronic imbeciles go to find out what kind of tin foil hat is hot on the market.

Womak, is a sniveling coward and a disgrace to humanity. Hopefully he won't breed, and if he does, I feel very sorry for his children.

Oh, and since Womak is a proven deceiver and loser, I will not link to his blog from here. No point even reading the lies he knowingly allows on his blog, while he censors the truth.

Exposing the Bacon Eating Atheist Jew

Below, how I picture Chris Womak and his superior WHITINESS:



Note: I did a Google blog search for "atheist Jew" and found a post at Chris Wombat's blog Politically Correct by Shmurtis Maynard. First off, I commented three times his blog, first to say I didn't realized that Sarkozy's mother was considered a Jew, and if she is, then Sarkozy is a Jew. But then I did some more quick research and I found that Sarkozy's mother's mother(his maternal grandma) was a Christian girl named Bouvier. So Sarkozy is not considered by anyone but paranoid White "supremacist" retards.
Of course, as stated previously, if John Kerry and Sarkozy are Joooos, then half the planet are Joooos too.
As for me hating whites. My wife is pure white, though there might be some Joooo conversion blood from Germany in the early 1800's in her bloodline. Most of my best friend are whites. I don't know if Italians count to these retards though so I won't include them.
As for the Protocols. I'm sure Sarkozy is reading his copy tonight before he goes to bed. ROFLMAO at thes impotent freaks.

UPDATE: At the bottom of this post, I copied the comments I made on Wombat's blog. He only posted the first comment, as the second and third proved the accusations against me were totally wrong as Sarkozy is not a Joooo. Such an impotent little coward Chris Wombat and his ilk are. I really do own him.


Exposing the Bacon Eating Atheist Jew

By Curt Maynard

I recently became aware of a Jewish Internet agent provocateur going by the moniker “bacon eating atheist Jew.” It seems he didn’t like a particular article I wrote a week ago entitled “Let’s Talk about Jews and Elections.”[1] I wonder why? Why would a professed ‘atheist’ care whether or not I wrote about Jews, isn’t Judaism a religion and not a race or ethnicity? Isn’t that what we’ve all been led to believe? Besides, what does he have against dialogue? Why is it that the bacon eating atheist Jew doesn’t want us to “talk” about Jews and elections?

In any case, I’d like to tear apart his argument and expose him for the fool and black propagandist he truly is. Here goes.

In my article “Let’s Talk about Jews and Elections” I exposed the fact that Nicolas Sarkozy, France’s new President, is a Jew. The bacon eating atheist Jew suggests he’s a Catholic. You decide [See photo above – note yarmulke].

In his critique of my article[2] the bacon eating atheist Jew suggests that Sarkozy isn’t Jewish that he’s a practicing Catholic:

“His grandfather, a Sephardi Jew by birth, was a convert to Catholicism, and Sarkozy was, accordingly, raised in the Catholic faith of his household. Nicolas Sarkozy, like his brothers, is a baptised and professing Catholic.”

This is a bold faced LIE and the bacon eating atheist Jew is a goddamned liar. He knows very well that Sarkozy is Jewish, he was born of a Jewish womb, Sarkozy’s mother is a Jew, therefore by Jewish law, so is Sarkozy PERIOD! He could be a practicing Buddhist and it wouldn’t matter, his mother is a Jew, therefore he is too. In effect what we have is a poor Internet propagandist, the BEAJ on one side insisting Sarkozy is a Catholic and one the other side we have some prestigious Jewish publications acknowledging the fact that Nicolas Sarkozy is as Jewish as matzo balls.

The Australian Jewish news[3] reports the following:

“it is well known that Sarkozy’s mother was born to the Mallah family, one of the oldest Jewish families of Salonika, Greece.”

The AJN additionally quotes Sarkozy himself stating the following which clearly illustrates that the new French President recognizes his Jewishness:
“IN an interview Nicolas Sarkozy gave in 2004, he expressed an extraordinary understanding of the plight of the Jewish people for a home: “Should I remind you the visceral attachment of every Jew to Israel, as a second mother homeland? There is nothing outrageous about it. Every Jew carries within him a fear passed down through generations, and he knows that if one day he will not feel safe in his country, there will always be a place that would welcome him. And this is Israel.”

The AJN isn’t the only publication to confirm that Sarkozy is a Jew; the Guardian confirms it,[4] as does the Israeli National News,[5] the Jewish Telegraph Agency,[6] the Jewish Journal,[7] and the European Jewish News, here[8] and here.[9] The Guardian even published an article entitled “The tough new president still loves his mum, France's real first lady,”[10] now if that doesn’t convince even the greatest skeptic that Nicolas is a “good Jewish boy,” I don’t know what will.

In short, the bacon eating atheist Jew is a liar, he knows very well that Nicolas Sarkozy is a Jew and the only reason he posted a critique of my article was on the off chance that a few ignorant Gentiles might read it.[11]

The BEAJ hates white people. It’s obvious, all one need do is read the man’s words. In his Judeophobe[12] critique of my article he refers to whites as “whitey,” and states the following:

“Any hoot, I'm sure you are now dumbfounded because by your own logic, you figured out that Joooos are the majority if include [sic] people like Sarkozy and Kerry. That is why you guys aren't in control, you dumb ass WHITEYS are the minority.”

Of course the BEAJ wants his Gentile readers to believe that when he uses the word “whitey,” he is only referring to ‘racist’ whites, but we really have no reason to believe him do we? He is after all a proven liar [see above].

Of the greatest interest, at least to me, is the BEAJ’s comments concerning the Protocols of the Elders of Zion. He reiterates the boringly predictable denunciation of the Protocols, you know the one, they’re fake, a fraud, a forgery, etc… Of course he doesn’t provide a link to them as I did in my article and am once again doing now [See the actual text of the Protocols of Zion here].[13] The Protocols were allegedly proven fraud after a trial in Berne Switzerland back in 1934. With this, I’d remind Gentile readers that a well publicized trial also found O.J. Simpson innocent of murder, despite the fact that he was obviously guilty. I’d remind readers that most recently a Jewish judge, Jewish prosecutor and Jewish Medical Examiner also allegedly found no evidence that Anna Nicole Smith’s Jewish husband, Howard Stern, murdered her and her son, despite the fact that even the dullest Fox News viewer isn’t very convinced of Stern’s alleged innocence. In reality, trials mean very little, especially when a Jewish media is reporting on them, as they did after the 1934 Berne Protocols case. This hasn’t changed much over the last 73 years, i.e. Iraq and WMD.

As far as the BEAJ’s assertion that the Protocols are fake, but his unwillingness to provide a link to them, consider these words written more than 50 years ago:

“The claim of the Jews that the Protocols are forgeries is in itself an admission of their genuineness, for they [Jews] NEVER ATTEMPT TO ANSWER THE FACTS corresponding to the THREATS which the Protocols contain, and, indeed, the correspondence between prophecy and fulfillment is too glaring to be set aside or obscured. This, the Jews well know and therefore evade.”[14]

BEAJ apparently accepts the fact that Jews are disproportionately represented in the fields I mentioned in my article as he utilizes the same by now predictable and dogmatic response:

“The bottom line is that Joooos are generally better educated and usually wind up with white collar jobs. Joooos don't prevent WHITEY from doing the same thing. The West is about capitalism, and whatever Jooooish entertainers, Jooooish politicians?, and media moguls do must be liked by the overwhelming majority of the population, or they'd be out of business.”

Of course I disagree with him, in fact, when I wrote the article, I accurately predicted some critic would emerge with the BEAJ’s argument, that’s why I included the following in my article:

“All of us have been thoroughly indoctrinated with the idea that Jews are indeed special and highly ambitious and this is supposed to explain their large showings in politics, academia, sciences, the media, etc… I personally think it far more likely that a Jewish stranglehold on OUR media better explains these discrepancies, I am not particularly impressed by their alleged abilities, after all, look around you; is the world really a better place with Jews at the helm?”

In short, the BEAJ does nothing but reinforce my argument that Jews, not necessarily Zionists alone, are part and parcel of a growing problem in the west, most of them tend to collaborate with criminal and Talmudic Jews, which makes them complicit. As I have said over and over, it is organized Jewry, which include propagandists like the BEAJ that seek to silence criticism by way of hate crime/hate speech legislation. I can’t tell you how often I am lambasted by Jews for writing about this, but nonetheless it’s a fact. I wrote about this in “Let’s Talk about Jews and Elections” when I penned the following:

“In the beginning of this article I noted the fact that France now has a Jewish President. I did this solely to point out in the end, that this phenomenon is not isolated to America, it has plagued Europe for decades and is the real reason Europe has passed draconian “hate crime” and “hate speech” legislation which has resulted in the imprisonment of thousands of European patriots. Jewish politicians are the primary force behind the passage of these laws, just as they are in the United States. These Jews hide behind the cloak of other minorities by using them as if they were the crux of concern, but in fact, these laws are designed for no other reason than to prevent exposure and criticism of ethnic Jews and their Supremacist policies/agenda.”[15]

The fact of the matter is, JEWS are behind pushing “hate crime” legislation through Congress and they will pull out all stops in their effort to rearrange the Constitution to fit their needs.

The largest Jewish publication in the world, The Forward, reinforces this fact with this recent article entitled “Jewish Groups Set To Fight Veto of Hate-Crimes Bill.”[16] In it, the attentive reader will find the following:


“Jewish organizations are playing a leading role in the coalition pushing the bill, with almost all of them — except the Orthodox ones — taking action to promote the passage of the measure. The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crime Prevention Act of 2007 passed the House floor last week, in a 237-180 vote. The Senate Judiciary Committee is expected to begin debating the bill within two weeks.”[17]


So there you have it – not from an alleged anti-Semite, but from the world’s largest Jewish publication, The Forward.


Lastly, lest you still sympathize with these people and in order to reinforce what kind of person the bacon eating atheist Jew really is, consider what he and his compatriots wrote to and about a 14-year old girl, Stefania Glenn, the daughter of Mark Glenn:


“You’re the ugly one, you sicialian wop whore. You’re people are related to Arabs. Hell you married an Arab. What is Marc Glenns REAL last name. You’re a papist whore. Go back to North Africa and take your swarthy southern italian mafia with you’[18]


Or this one from the atheist Jew himself:[19]


“‘You really are a stupid freak. You are a common retard. You have no argument. Nothing but an imbecile. You have an inferior complex, maybe because you are an Arab, I don’t know. Fuck off and die. You have kids. Hopefully they didn’t inherit your self loathing and inferiority and low IQ. If they did they did and think like you, they should have been aborted. You are a sad sad twerp’

Benevolent and altruistic Jews no?

Wake up America; you’re being taken for a ride.
******************************************
Here are the three comments I left on Wombat's blog:


BEAJ:
If Sarkozy's mother was a Jew, then he is a Jew.

I was not aware his mother was a Jew.

I don't lie.

But you are still a Joooo paranoid loser and freak show.

Joooos own you. LMAOAY you pathetic twerp.


BEAJ:
Wombat, Sarkozy's maternal grandmother was a Christian named Bouvier. So he is not considered a Joooo. And if he is considered a Joooo, then half the planet are Joooos.

You imbecile. Honestly, I'm laughing my ass off at your impotence.

Now, bow to your superior, you moron.
I own you.


BEAJ:
I don't hate white people, I just laugh at WHITEY's like you, who think you have some special skin color.
You Joooo paranoid WHITEYs.
My wife has no Jooooish blood, she is a white woman, same with my brother, and they have 4 kids.
You'd consider them all Joooos. Well, half the planet are Joooos according you paranoid freaks.

Gotta go, back to reading the Protocols.

LMAO

Too hilarious. You impotent little man.

The Joooos Made Farfur Cheat On A Test

Note: Many bloggers have posted on the mindless irrational hatred being taught to Palestinian children and the Mickey Mouse lookalike named Farfur. This video doesn't just represent the Palestinians inability to blame themselves, but all Joooo haters who blame the Joooos for anything they don't like about the economy, for example, or their own crappy existence.

It is hard to differentiate between Palestinians and the Stormfront crew when it comes to whining and blaming. "It was against my will, the Joooos are to blame, they are responsible.l Blah, blah, blah."

H/T Reza.

Let's Talk About Jews and Elections

Note: Of course, if all the people this Judeophobe claim are Joooos, then Joooos make up a heck of a bigger chunk of the population this twit is giving us credit for. Take Nicholas Sarkozy for instance, from Wikipedia: His grandfather, a Sephardi Jew by birth, was a convert to Catholicism, and Sarkozy was, accordingly, raised in the Catholic faith of his household. Nicolas Sarkozy, like his brothers, is a baptised and professing Catholic.

If everyone with a Jooooish ancestor was considered Jooooish in America, maybe 50% of the US would be considered Jooooish. That would make WHITEY with no Joooish connections the minority. No wonder they don't run anything. It is tough for minorities to run things like the media and the government. I love it. Such imbeciles.

The bottom line is that Joooos are generally better educated and usually wind up with white collar jobs. Joooos don't prevent WHITEY from doing the same thing. The West is about capitalism, and whatever Jooooish entertainers, Jooooish politicians?, and media moguls do must be liked by the overwhelming majority of the population, or they'd be out of business.

WHITEY (and by WHITEY I mean the folks at Natall and David Duke) can WHINE all they want. The truth is the majority of the population knows they are social and intellectual outcasts worth next to nothing. Joooos occupy their tiny little "brains."

You gotta love it when these idiots quote the Protocols. First off, it is a known fake, and secondly, the assertion being made, that even people with one Jooooish grandparent are part of the big conspiracy. Hilarious!!!!

Update: Welcome you imbeciles from the Vanguard News Network message board. It is 6:16 PM EST and I've got quite a few hits from your site. Still no messages. Didn't the comment you are responding to say this?:

Please consider leaving a message on this kikes website as it relates to the article "Let's Talk about Jews and Elections"

http://judeophobewatch.blogspot.com/

Any hoot, I'm sure you are now dumbfounded because by your own logic, you figured out that Joooos are the majority if include people like Sarkozy and Kerry. That is why you guys aren't in control, you dumb ass WHITEYS are the minority.

Enjoy the idiotic spewing of Curt Maynard:


Let’s Talk about Jews and Elections

By Curt Maynard


I’ll make this short. Jews dominate the media period. This is not an anti-Semitic canard, a false accusation, a bigoted remark, or an uninformed opinion. This is an empirical fact. For those out there still in doubt, please read “who rules America.”[1] Deconstruct and prove the article wrong if you can, I encourage you to; it will only reinforce the fact in your mind once you realize it’s true. I’ve been accused of anti-Semitism by many different people for refusing to omit the fact that Jews dominate the media in my writings, some people say I should be blaming Zionists, not Jews, but the fact of the matter is, I don’t know whether or not all of the Jewish owners and CEO’s of the major networks are Zionists, but I do know they are ethnic Jews. I’ve been accused of racism [nee white supremacism] for saying that blacks commit more than 50% of the murders every year in the United States, despite the fact that United States Department of Justice statistics prove the same. In other words, I am accused of anti-Semitism and racism for writing the truth. So be it, if telling the truth means that I am a racist and an anti-Semite, I can live with that.

France has a population of sixty million. According to the Jewish Virtual Library,[2] France’s Jewish population is less that 500,000, meaning that Jews compose less than 1% of the French population. Despite this fact, a Jew, Nicolas Sarkozy is now France’s President. His opponent in last week’s election, Segolene Royal, is the “life partner” [meaning unmarried anywhere else] of the Jewish François Hollande, leader of France’s socialist party. To break it down simply, despite the fact that Jews compose less than 1% of the French population, a Jew and a woman married to a Jew composed 100% of the candidates France had to choose from in regards to the final Presidential election. In any case, Sarkozy’s win is being celebrated by Jews worldwide.[3]

Oh come on Maynard, it’s just a coincidence, right? Wrong! In the 2004 US Presidential election, the very same unlikely sampling manifested itself among Democratic candidates – pay attention – this is important. The only real viable choices for Democrats in the 2004 Primary elections were the following:

Howard Dean [Married to a Jewish woman, Judith Steinberg, his children are being raised Jewish.[4]]

John Kerry [Entered the race claiming to be a Catholic until it was revealed that he’s actually Jewish, a “surprise” according to Kerry, but nonetheless a FACT]

Wesley Clark [Jewish according Wikipedia.[5] Clark actually addressed a Jewish group during the election stating "I am the oldest son, of the oldest son, of the oldest son -- at least five generations, and they were all rabbis."[6]]

Joe Lieberman [Orthodox Jew][7]

What this means is that 100% of the viable Democratic candidates in the 2004 primary were either Jewish or in the case of Dean, married to a Jew. Now wait, it gets worse.

On the Republican side there was never any doubt that Bush would retain the party’s endorsement. Few would argue today that George Bush is without any doubt, the most Philo-Semitic president this country’s history. Bush has cast aside American sovereignty by stating publicly that he, and therefore the United States [you and I] will back Israel under any circumstances in a mid East war. Bush’s administration has placed more ethnic Jews in highly sensitive positions than any other President in American history, with the possible exception of Clinton, who by the way endorsed another crypto-Jew named Madeleine Albright, who hid here Jewish ancestry[8] in exactly the same way John Kerry and George Allen[9] did. Albright of course was once the Secretary of State where she predictably coddled Israel and did her best to suppress the extent of Israeli crimes committed during the Clinton years.

In regards to Bush and the number of Jews he has appointed to high positions within his administration – see here.[10] Of note is Michael Chertoff, who has what amounts to as one of the most powerful positions in the US government today, he is the Director of Homeland Security,[11] an assignment that places him in a position to do just about anything he likes and then to effectively cover it all up. Chertoff was the primary force behind the illegal arrest, and unconstitutional detention and rendition of the world’s foremost political prisoner today, Ernst Zundel.[12] Chertoff is of course Jewish and a dual citizen of Israel.

George Allen was once considered to be one of the strongest Republican candidates[13] for the 2008 Presidential run; that is until it was revealed that he too is a Jew pretending to be something else – see how Allen responded to a reporter that asked him about his Jewish ancestry – talk about angry][14] Why was Allen so angry? Did the reporter reveal something that ruined years and years of careful orchestration? I think so.

The point of writing this short article is to highlight the very unusual fact that ethnic Jews are over-represented by tens of thousands of times in positions of political importance in the United States. Consider that they represent only 2.5% of the United States population and you’ll understand how it is that I find their disproportionate representation in Presidential primaries highly unlikely. All of us have been thoroughly indoctrinated with the idea that Jews are indeed special and highly ambitious and this is suppose to explain their large showings in politics, academia, sciences, the media, etc… I personally think it far more likely that a Jewish stranglehold on OUR media better explains these discrepancies, I am not particularly impressed by their alleged abilities, after all, look around you; is the world really a better place with Jews at the helm?

In the beginning of this article I noted the fact that France now has a Jewish President. I did this solely to point out in the end, that this phenomenon is not isolated to America, it has plagued Europe for decades and is the real reason Europe has passed draconian “hate crime” and “hate speech” legislation which has resulted in the imprisonment of thousands of European patriots. Jewish politicians are the primary force behind the passage of these laws, just as they are in the United States. These Jews hide behind the cloak of other minorities by using them as if they were the crux of concern, but in fact, these laws are designed for no other reason than to prevent exposure and criticism of ethnic Jews and their Supremacist policies/agenda.

Consider the words of Patrick Grimm, noted Internet author, webmaster of Zionist Watch and political dissident as he comments on an excerpt from the Protocols that cannot be conveniently explained away with cries of anti-Semitism and bigotry:
“Below is just one excerpt from the Protocols that will illustrate to you just how well the Jewish laid plans are progressing along their dire course, the consequences for the rest of us be damned. Oh, but I suppose all the little Jewish civil rights groups would simply label these truths as a "canard", one of their favorite terminologies that they fetch from the bag of tricks when someone turns the heat up. No, it would probably be a "blood libel" as every other foray and examination of Jewish wrongdoing is conveniently named. To read the entire disgusting Zionistic display simply go HERE (and I do advise doing that). Well, here is the excerpt promised”:[15]


WE CONTROL THE PRESS

4. NOT A SINGLE ANNOUNCEMENT WILL REACH THE PUBLIC WITHOUT OUR CONTROL. Even now this is already being attained by us inasmuch as all news items are received by a few agencies, in whose offices they are focused from all parts of the world. These agencies will then be already entirely ours and will give publicity only to what we dictate to them.

5. If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the GOY communities to such an extent that they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the colored glasses of those spectacles we are setting astride their noses; if already now there is not a single State where there exist for us any barriers to admittance into what GOY stupidity calls State secrets: what will our positions be then, when we shall be acknowledged supreme lords of the world in the person of our king of all the world ....

6. Let us turn again to the FUTURE OF THE PRINTING PRESS. Every one desirous of being a publisher, librarian, or printer, will be obliged to provide himself with the diploma instituted therefore, which, in case of any fault, will be immediately impounded. With such measures THE INSTRUMENT OF THOUGHT WILL BECOME AN EDUCATIVE MEANS ON THE HANDS OF OUR GOVERNMENT, WHICH WILL NO LONGER ALLOW THE MASS OF THE NATION TO BE LED ASTRAY IN BY-WAYS AND FANTASIES ABOUT THE BLESSINGS OF PROGRESS. Is there any one of us who does not know that these phantom blessings are the direct roads to foolish imaginings which give birth to anarchical relations of men among themselves and towards authority, because progress, or rather the idea of progress, has introduced the conception of every kind of emancipation, but has failed to establish its limits .... All the so-called liberals are anarchists, if not in fact, at any rate in thought. Every one of them in hunting after phantoms of freedom, and falling exclusively into license, that is, into the anarchy of protest for the sake of protest....”

Grimm concludes with the following:

“There it is, folks. The 'We Control the Press' dictate has already been achieved. In fact, it is now axiomatic that media is a Jewish domain. Their control of our thoughts and "ways of thinking" is a foregone conclusion. When they state "If already now we have contrived to possess ourselves of the minds of the GOY communities to such an extent that they all come near looking upon the events of the world through the colored glasses of those spectacles we are setting astride their noses," we can now safely proclaim "MISSION ACCOMPLISHED" for our Jewish kings, lords and masters! Most Americans see events, people, places and things through Jewish eyes and think "Jewishly" in ways that are probably more subconscious than explicit.”[16]

Wake up America, you are being deceived!

Some good news, according to an article I read this morning, ABC News is reporting quietly, i.e. on their website, not on their television network, that 2.5 million Americans are no longer watching television as they were one year ago.[17] This is indeed a good sign – it reveals that 2.5 million Americans have already woken up!

Jew sends Paris To Jail, Negro Brandy No Go To Jail

I couldn't tell at first, if the blog named Black Monitor was a lampoon site or serious. Unfortunately, it seems serious. The site "master" usually picks on blacks, but haters have a tendency to just hate, and if you are a hater, you just gotta hate the Jooooos too.

Jew sends Paris To Jail, Negro Brandy No Go To Jail

Now don’t get me wrong, I am no fan of Paris Hilton. But I can’t help but think why does this white woman go to jail for a relatively minor infraction while negress Brandy has not even seen a cell yet. Negress Brandy KILLED someone for hell’s sake while driving recklessly and no jail for that? WTF? Sniff Sniff. Wait a minute… I smell a kike.

A judge sentenced a shocked and tearful Paris Hilton to 45 days in jail on Friday, ruling that the celebrity hotel heiress violated her probation for an earlier alcohol-related traffic offense. Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Michael Sauer sternly rejected Hilton’s story that she did not knowingly disobey the law by driving while her license was suspended and ordered the 26-year-old socialite to report to a county detention facility on June 5, or face 90 days in jail.

Sauer = jew name! Think about it for a minute. Paris Hilton has way enough money to hire round-the-clock drivers if she knew her license was expired, right? So maybe the idiot probably really did not know her license was expired. The jew was aware of this possibility. Not only did the jew send her to jail for 45 days, but the jew sent her to a negro jail (Lynwood, CA is gets its negroes from Compton da hood). That is where negress Brandy should be!

Dr. Kevin MacDonald: Aryan Jew Expert

Gotta love this interview. At least the first bit, when Palestinian American Hesham Tillawi finds that he bit off more than he can chew by interviewing Dr. Kevin MacDonald, author and psychology professor.

You see, MacDonald has written many books on Jewish social evolution. He is applauded by white supremacist groups all over America and Europe because of his views on how, why, and when Jooooos have taken control of the media, the banks, and have changed "white" culture wherever they went.

You get the idea that MacDonald believes his findings are scientific fact, but they are only based on Joooo paranoid speculation. The only thing scientific about his studies is the FACT that Khazar theory is bull crap. That kind of stuff can be studied scientifically using gene research.

Tillawi obviously didn't research his guest very well. Instead of just piling on the rhetoric that Jooos control the US senate and that is why the US supports Israel, he got toasted by the fact that MacDonald's research has debunked Khazar theory. Tillawi's reaction in the interview is priceless, because the biggest contention the Paliphiles have is their idea that most Joooos are Khazar and their ancestors never set foot in the middle east.

White supremacist sites often quote MacDonald, except for the Khazar part. And MacDonald himself, is a Judeophobe who either won't face up to the fact honestly or is too stupid to realize it. He went to bat for David Irving, on the basis that his mandate to do so, was free speech.

To be honest, I agree with some of MacDonald's findings regarding reasons for success and intelligence, but I think they go way too extreme. What he misses, is that the reason Jews appear to have control is that on major issues regarding ethics and morality, the average Jew meshes very well with Western morals and ethics. At least, what the majority in the West want. The West is capitalistic, and if collectively, they didn't like what the media was saying, or what was on TV, etc. Jews would just go broke:) The main reason that the US supports Israel is because once you strip the irrational Jooo hating, you are left with a state that pretty much represents Western ideology.

Here is an article on the controversy of MacDonald as a university professor.

MacDonald's views on genetic isolation is controversial, but it does carry some merit. Too bad he didn't talk about it with respect to the Arab Muslim world.

The Daughter Of The Devil Gets Interviewed By A Deceitful Liar

Here Mark Glenn's precious daughter, Stefania spews her rhetorical fiction on a cable show hosted by Palestinian American Hesham Tillawi. Her story was absolute pathetic nonsense, and yet the host doesn't flinch when it comes to her talking about the "heartless Jooo soldiers."
Tillawi knows Mark Glenn, and knows full well how brainwashed Stefania is by her Judeophobic lying father. One has to laugh that she is disguised as a newly informed "Christian" American.
Listening to Tillawi and his revisionist history around the 30 minute mark was so typical of the deceitful Paliphiles. It is sad listening to him. Almost torturous.

Polite Discussion On Zionism: Is It Possible?

Note: Here is an article where the author, Karin Friedemann, aka Muslim pretending to be a Jew, Maria Hussain, uses the most useless, baseless, and false argument to basically state Israel has no right to exist. And she expects Jews to have a polite discussion on it? Lets have a polite discussion on the fact that Israel does exist, and that for the most part, Jews stole nothing or next nothing. It is completely false to paint a picture that Palestinian Arabs who lived where Israel is now, OWNED their property. In the overwhelming majority of the situations, they did not. FACT: Arabs who lived in the Palestine region in 1947 only owned 3.3% of the land. Most of the land was state land, and unowned.
And houses were not bulldozed for no reason.
She paints all right wing Joooos with one brush, and all left wing Joooos with another, while lying about what they collectively supposedly say. You have to read her other works to see how Judeophobic she really is.
It is tough to politely argue with someone who is either lying or wilfully ignorant.

The following article was picked up by most anti-semitic sites on the internet. They all make a point that the author is a Jew. She is as Jewish as Mark Glenn is. Here is an expose written by Elder of Ziyon a while back on another one of her stories. She is completely dishonest. It was found out that she posts under this name as well: Karima4483@aol.com

One more thing before you read the article. She lives in the Boston area and is half of a notorious husband-wife team. Read this from another article:

"If Friedemann/Hussain, whose writing appears on various Islamist and anti-Jewish Web sites (including former KKK head David Duke's white supremacist publication WhiteCivilRights.org) is a strange one, she has nothing on al Jezeera's favorite "scholar" of Jewish history and anthropology, Joachim Martillo."



JUDEOPHOBE POST STARTS HERE:
The Zionist philosophizes that the Palestinian is not a human (Israel was a land without a people). The Anti-Zionist argues that the Palestinian is a human being. So what is the moderate viewpoint? The Palestinian is a quasi-human? Is this the American Progressive Jewish position?


Polite Discussion on Zionism: Is it Possible?
Karin Friedemann
April 25, 2007
World View News Service
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/wvns/message/7271


I found http://www.realisticdove.org/ very interesting because it is the first time I have come across a progressive Jew so honest about his racism. Usually when confronted, these confused souls just get indignant and refuse to speak to you for a few months. I always wondered how a person could think that Israel has a "right"to "security" and shrug off this amazing assumption with the accusation that anyone who has questions about his definitions is accusing him of being an evil murderer. Why would any sane person think that he has the right to live unharrassed on someone else's stolen property? Even the cute kids waving Israeli flags are participating in a criminally insane political ideology.

Progressive Jews want to make the bottom line "Jews are nice people." But that is not the bottom line. As Hillel mentioned, the bottom line is that you don't do to others what you don't want others to do to you. What would we expect if our neighbor, with or without warning, bulldozed our house?

First, we would call the police. If the man with the bulldozer failed to stop bulldozing the house, the police officer would have the duty to disable the vehicle and he might even shoot him. I'm talking about American law. The primary concept of civil rights is that you and your neighbor are sharing the same set of laws and punishments. The bulldozer man would be stopped. He would be considered a criminal. He would be put on trial. He would go to prison. If he had killed people in the process of bulldozing the house, he might even be executed. The owner of the house that was bulldozed would be entitled to damages plus extra for pain and suffering. The law requires that his property be restored to the original state that it was in. That includes replanting the trees and fixing the pavement around the house.

The emotional defensiveness of Jews is actually quite amusing, where they want to argue that the bulldozer man was not evil, he was not a murderer. The family that moved into the stolen property are just innocent idealists. They may be misguided, or mistaken, but for some reason Jews want to argue that they are not evil. What they are really saying is that they don't want Jews to be held legally accountable for their actions. They want to enjoy the privilege of being "protected" from the laws that apply to other people.

A law does not cover the "evilness" of a criminal. It covers actions and consequences.

If international law were followed, the Israeli "government' would never have kicked out any Palestinians. The entire existence of Israel is based on the condition made by the UN that Palestinians would remain in their homes and receive equal citizenship in the new nation state. That condition was not followed. Therefore, there is no legal basis for any assumption that Israel has a right to exist according to the UN. In fact, Israel does not really exist. It is a figment of imagination, the defensive mechanism of the neurotic Jewish collective consciousness. I agree that we need to stop arguing about isms but the next step is to solve the problems. Don't wait for the world community to force Israel to do it. Why don't we, as Jews, just do it? Why are Progressive Jews wasting their time feeling emotionally threatened by a one state solution? The real problem is that we are feeling emotionally threatened by any solution. Because a solution means that Jews need to be prosecuted.

The refugees must be given back their property with extra for damages. Even if they fled their homes because Arab leaders told them to get out of the fighting zone in 1948, they have the legal right to return to their homes as soon as the fighting stops. Small wonder why Israel continues to attack people day after day. The refugees must be given full civil rights. Full water rights, full road rights, and the full right to prosecute every Jewish family in America that has any property in the Holy Land as part of an organized crime network. Especially if both the Palestinian and the Jewish persons are American citizens. For example one friend of mine, after her family was forced off their land by gunpoint, New York Jews bought the land, bulldozed everything, and planted orange trees. She knows where they live. She knows their names. Anyone who buys or sells stolen property is a criminal who needs to be prosecuted. Any Jew who owns Palestinian property in the Holy Land should have his property seized, including their US assets, just like we did to the rum smugglers who funded Jewish terrorism in the 1920s, and Progressive Jews should insist on it instead of doing these mental "I'm not evil" gymnastics.

The Jews need to give back what they stole. I am not sure why that is so confusing to people. There needs to be a world tribunal like the Nuremburg trials to determine what was done and who was responsible, and to put an end to this nonsense. But failing that, the US legal system could solve the problem within a year if we just prosecuted this obnoxious real estate mafia. Why are Progressive Jews not lobbying for criminal penalties on Jews who invest in property that was cleared of its original owners by force in the Holy Land? There is enough room in Bush's new prisons for all these shady real estate agents. This is a simple matter of holding people legally accountable for the harm they cause others and for undermining the security of the United States in the process. It is exactly the same issue with dispute over the Roxbury Mosque in Boston. Some shady white (Jewish) real estate dealers were furious that the black community benefited from this piece of land next to the subway station that they wanted to develop, so now they are engaging in extra-legal trickery and character assassination to try to get that piece of real estate away from the people who own it. Once the Palestinians get their land back and all the Zionist organizations' assets are confiscated to repair the damage they have done, then we can talk about whether or not "the Jewish People" have the right to "self-determination" in the form of an ethnocentric nation state.

I learned when I was a kid that the way to get self-determination - i.e., the ability to do what you want when you want how you want - is to behave yourself. The Jews are not behaving themselves, and there is nothing okay about it. When a Progressive Jew avoids discussion by whining, "You think I'm evil!!" he or she breaks the heart of the human being who is trying to have peace with this person. It ends all rational discussion. It ends all hope for peace.

Sometimes Palestinians find it easier to deal with right wing Zionists than left wing because at least they are honest. A Palestinian can say to a right wing Jew, "You stole my property." The right wing Jew will say, "Yeah, and what are you going to do about it? My religion says I can steal your property." Then the Muslim can with dignity say, "Well my religion says that God curses the man who puts another man out of his home, and that I have the right to fight you." That actually can be done in the context of a polite dialogue. A peace plan is even potentially possible. Because then the Jew can say, "Well, I don't want you to kill me and I can see why you would think that I deserved it, because if you did the same thing to me I would certainly kill you. So let's make a deal. I'll let you live in the garage." This is still insulting behavior, but it's in the process of becoming less sadistic.

On the other hand, if a Palestinian says to a Progressive Jew, "You stole my property!" the Progressive Jew will usually shut down entirely. I have seen a fifty year old man start crying and insisting he's not evil. This is the behavior of someone who is guilty as sin. Like when you accuse your husband of adultery and he starts guilt-tripping you about how you don't believe in him (hypothetical but common scenario).

The other reaction is to get maliciously angry and start doing character assassination via gossip so that none of the other Progressive Jews will greet that person who brought up the "touchy" subject. They will be told that this person is an "enemy of peace" - so that it will be politically correct to shun them the same way that we avoid eye contact with skinheads and Bible thumpers. Progressive Jews are the most amazingly idealistic people on the planet. They want to be able to continue to sit on someone else's stolen property (or at least vacation on it) and not only do they think they have a "right" to travel around unharmed, ride the buses, shop and eat pizza while the people they made homeless have no water or food - but they want their victims to LIKE them. The Jews are the only conquerors in the history of the planet that expected the conquered people to LIKE them! If they don't like us, we feel offended and outraged. And what Jews consider as "liking behavior" is never mentioning the property they stole.

I've discussed some of this with Avigail Abarbanel, an ex-Israeli psychiatrist in Australia. She views Zionism as a mental illness that can be treated. But Zionism is just a symptom of a deeper problem, the delusional belief that you have "rights" which do not exist. Like a kid thinking he has the right to hit his sister. It's a failure to apply the Golden Rule to one's personal sense of responsibility in certain situations. The inner conflict that arises from these "situational ethics" certainly does create a clinically diagnosable mental inability to process certain types of information that trigger the neurotic or sometimes even psychotic defensive reaction.

Unfortunately, when it comes to Israel, Jews are defensive in the sense that they cannot process the type of information that is necessary to create peaceful behaviors. For example, if a Jew and Palestinian live next door to each other in New Jersey, the Jew being the "owner" of a condo built on the Palestinian person's property, don't you think the Jew should offer to give it back, if he expects the other's friendship? If the Palestinian, as is normal, invites the Jew over for tea and politely doesn't bring up the subject, does the Jew feel that this means it's OK what he did? That he can forgive himself? That is what Jews want after all. We want to be forgiven without apology for everything we have done AND everything we are about to do.

Is this a rational approach to peace? Is it working?

Venom From The Babes Of Zion

Note: I'm not too sure if this person is just a long winded rhetorical imbecile, or if he is a dimwitted anti-semite who doesn't have a clue how Jooooo paranoid he is. I was wrong about him not publishing my comments, so he is at least a step above slug shit Mark Glenn. It is highly unlikely the 14 year old boy was anything but a shill. But what I know for sure is that Mark Glenn edits comments to suit his agenda, and mostly doesn't publish comments. I also know that he is allowing his 14 year old daughter to take credit for the Goldstein's article whether she wrote it or not. Either way, it is child abuse.


Venom from the Babes of Zion
April 17th, 2007
by pittershawnpalmer

This young person is 14 years old. If we weren’t sure before, we see without question now that there is a definitive hate within the zionist community for anyone who is a non-jew. It is mind boggling how the world cannot see this. People everywhere are truly asleep. I would venture to say they are catatonic.

See entire piece here: http://newsfromthewest.blogspot.com/2007/04/those-who-dare-to-lecture-us.html

Those Who Dare To Lecture Us
by Mark Glenn

…Other gems I have personally received from some of God’s chosen people, such as this one from a ‘nice Jewish boy’ named Ori who lives in Israel and who can be reached at orrican@hotmail.com–

“I am a Jew, I am an Israeli, I am a Zionist, and I am both racially and intellectually superior to you, the non-Jew. For your lies, your pathetic stupidity, and your anti-Semitism, your people will suffer under the punishment of the world’s future super-power, Israel. Jews are superior to dirty-blooded non-Jews like you. While your ancestors were sleeping with the swine in the forests of Europe, my ancestors were building the city of Jerusalem. I am a Jew, you are not. I have the privilege of having god by my side, as well as the world’s supreme nation. Perhaps you do not yet see that the worst is awaiting your kind, in the face of the coming Islamo-Christian War, from which my kind will arise victorious. I am only 14 years old, but I have enough wisdom to see that you are nothing but a piece of gentile filth. No matter, perhaps god will find it suitable that a terrorist attack will end your misery. I shall personally pray for it to be so.”

…
Posted in the rabbit hole, articles, digging deep |
6 Responses to “Venom from the Babes of Zion”

1. The Atheist Jew Says:
April 18th, 2007 at 3:08 pm
That letter is not from a Jew. Just more BS coming from the Islamonazis.

Mark Glenn’s daughter at 14 has been brainwashed to hate. You should write a piece about her.
You probably won’t and you probably won’t publish this comment either.
You will take the cowardly approach, I’m almost sure.

2. pittershawn Says:
April 20th, 2007 at 1:48 pm
My dear Atheist Khazarian, it seems you have mistaken me for the angry and hateful people you associate with. The difference between you and I is that I am able to see the truth, even through those who are angry. Whereas you, all you see is what you want to see. And you see it clouded by bias and anger.

So let me see if I’ve got this right. Bare with me, because I may not get it right. As you would believe, I’m too biased to see the truth, right? But you, my dear, you are objective! Right?

Ok, based on YOUR words, it is IMPOSSIBLE for that note to be from a Jewish boy, but highly probable, if not most likely, that Mark’s daughter is hateful? Is that right? I don’t know here, maybe it’s my logic. Let me try that again for my own edification. The only possible scenario, in your estimation, because nothing else is at all possible, is that that letter was not from a Jewish kid, but Mark’s daughter is hateful.

Ok folks, is it me? Am I the only one who sees the glaring problem with this train of thought?

Khazarian, I would have had far more respect for your angry ramblings if you had given me a few other possible scenarios, such as:

1. That letter was from a Jewish kid, it was evil and self righteous, but Mark’s daughter has been equally venomous in her commentary, so that poor boy shouldn’t be the only one put on the block.

2. That letter probably was from a Jewish boy, but because of bias, you can’t admit to it, even though Mark’s daughter has done nothing or said nothing that was equally offensive (such as threaten or wish death upon all non-Jews).

3. That letter was probably from a Jewish boy, and Mark’s daughter is probably only angry as a response to the bad behavior she’s been observing in the Jewish community—specifically Zionist community.

4. That letter was not from a Jewish boy, and Mark’s daughter is also being framed by someone hateful, in an effort to make her look bad because of Mark’s commentaries. Hence, both of them are being wrongly accused because of a group’s agenda.

Now, if you had honestly had the above kind of discourse, with us hashing out all the OTHER logical possibilities, including admitting to your bias (and the fact that you really don’t want to believe that a Jewish boy could have written that), then I would have had more respect for what you had to write. Bet if that note was all sweet and flowery, you would have had no problem believing it was a Jewish boy, right?

But as it stands, it seems you are typical of most angry Khazarians, determined to spin life and situations only to your advantage, in an effort to make everyone else in the world look hateful except you and the rest of your converts; who, by the way, are only angry because you can’t cover up that fact any longer. What fact is that? That you are NOT the chosen people by birth, but a group who have taken on the religion in an effort to find what you did not have in your Khazarian Empire.

As for who is a coward, it seems people like you are the only cowards. Rather than openly doing your dirt, you will no doubt, like the coward you really are, send your cronies to pick me off in a most unusual manner. Tell me how you will get rid of me, Khazarian. A convenient car accident? A random robbery on the street, or a break in into my home by an armed gunman? Tell me Khazarian. You will find some doctor within my circle to give me something that will induce a heart attack, or some terminal illness. Oh wait, you will find a way to get people to believe I am someone who spits hate, and set up a showdown between me and your cronies. Or how about this one, you will plan for the next year to set it up so it looks like I committed suicide. Who will write my suicide note, you? Tell me my dear Atheist Khazarian, what cowardly method will you use to get rid of me and those like me who know the real deal about people like you.

There is only one saving grace…that all Jews are not like you. I THANK the universe that there are some good and decent Jews whom I’ve met, Orthodox and others, who have denounced people like you as Zionists with an agenda. It is these same exemplary and spiritually centered Jewish men and women who have made every effort not to desecrate the religion—and communicate kindly and peacefully. And it is them who are in the real struggle to bring all the hateful Jewish people in the world to the carpet. They are the only ones I will stand behind and struggle with. I share their voice of disappointment in those who have no respect for religion or human life and dignity.

I’m sure after this message, at some point before I reach 80 years old, you and your other angry Khazarian converts will find a way to neatly shut me up—that is what you do with all non-jews, no? Because YOU, my dear, are the cowards. You don’t want anyone to know that people like me are on to you. And now that I’ve put this out there, I’m sure if you don’t pick me off like an antelope, you will no doubt find other ways to destroy me—maybe financially, socially, pin me with a crime even (petty or major, doesn’t matter), nothing would surprise me at this point. And why? Because that is all you can do. You are spiritually powerless and spiritually dead, so you use the evil machinations of the world to ruin people by telling lies and being deceitful—and sometimes, using our human and insignificant imperfections against us by creating a mountain out of what usually would be dealt with without fanfare. You and those like you are dishonest.

I have no need to check to see if Mark’s daughter is taught hate, because if she in fact is, then you and that nice Jewish boy and her are all in for the same spiritual fate. Karma ignores no one.

I don’t have to agree with the method of delivery of every message, not even Mark’s, to see the value in it. And I respect Mark’s candor by the way. You should make attempts to be even remotely open in that regard—look beyond your evident bias. Bottom line, why didn’t you include in your message one of her notes of hate? You should have, because then your comment would have been better received. But you talk without producing anything. Produce it, and then we can have a constructive debate around the wrongs of children who hate. Then you and I can make an effort to share ideas on where the chasm is in this world between people of different faiths and belief systems. But you do not want that discussion. You want to leave empty notes that do nothing more than show your bias…. ‘a Jewish boy didn’t write that.’ Is that all? And you expect me to take you seriously when you are not grounded in logic? Just admit that you believe that because it was a Jewish boy attached to that message of hate, not because it is impossible. For all you know, one of your undercover family members wrote it and there would be no way for you to every know it. Maybe you wrote it and are too cowardly to admit that you believe everything written in that note.

Go on, cry anti-Semitism. It is your first recourse. But alas, I know this spin as well. What was the name of that gentleman who came up with that in the late 1800s? No matter. Bottom line, to be Semitic begins with language, my dear. There are several aub-groups of languages that fall under the afro-asiatic language group. One of those is the Semitic LANGUANGE. Under the Semitic languages are also several sub-groups of languages. One, out of about five or six groups (I might be off by one) happens to be Hebrew, of which there are about 5 million NATIVE speakers. The other Semitic language, which comprises nearly 400 million speakers is, you ready for this baby…ARABIC. What does that mean, you say? It means someone has been telling lies. Because it seems the largest group of Semitic speakers would be Arabs. Ah, but no one must know, right? You say, what does it matter? Big deal? My dear, it is a big deal, because that would mean the Jewish community is using a false notion to keep people from questioning any action they take in any circumstances. And why you say? Because people who have no behavior want desperately to cover their tracks. So when someone makes a statement about a HUMAN’s negative actions, THEY, certain hypocritical Jews, will have a crutch to say, it HAPPENS to be because they are Jewish, when in reality, it HAPPENS to be because that INDIVIDUAL is a bad person with no moral or spiritual standards.

All said, I have no use for people who are evil. I strive to learn all I can and grow from that. My first stopping point…HISTORY. My second stopping point, spirit.
3. The Atheist Jew Says:
April 25th, 2007 at 3:28 pm

You are wrong about making judgment of me based on edited comments by Mark Glenn.
You were just as wrong as assuming me to be a Khazar (which is just an uneducated assumption) as I was in not in at least allowing for the possibility that the 14 year old was a Jew. But I do know that Mark Glenn edits comments, and mostly doesn’t allow them to go through. I have them saved on cocomment. I am not lying about this. Mark Glenn is an anti-semitic (Jooo hating for the Webster impaired) piece of garbage. He does not allow for honest debate.
He has attacked Jews, not individually but collectively. And you still respect him? Either you are a hypocrite or a liar.
http://crescentandcross.wordpress.com/2006/11/07/judaism-is-nobody%e2%80%99s-friend/
So don’t bother lecturing me, like your shit doesn’t stink.

Jews are not a race, but we are an ethnicity and/or a religion. Mark Glenn and Adolph Hitler have no problem identifying us as an ethnicity. And there was a recent where one third of Jewish females alive today trace back to 4 Jewish women of middle easter descent. Sure there have been conversions in and out of Judaism as well.

All I know is that if I were in Germany in 1939, Hitler and his buddies wouldn’t ask me if I believed in God or not.

And calling me sweetie is very immature.

I find you to be insincere for your respect of the garbage that is Mark Glenn, therefore you are not to be trusted. I would love to see your comments about his post about Judaism though. I want to see how you weasel out of it.
4. pittershawn Says:
April 25th, 2007 at 5:05 pm

You actually have some nerve. You spew hate on my blog, when all I did was point out the shortcomings of Zionists, NOT all Jews, and then you are upset that I defend what I posted? Who is the hypocrite here? You are the only hypocrite on this blog my dear.

As for Mark, I have not known him long enough to experience what you are claiming. So far, he has said nothing but, in what I’ve read to date (because I haven’t read all of his work) that is anything more than an attempt to point out the issues with Zionists, and, sometimes, Jews.

So for me to respect him, at this moment in time, is not hypocrisy. If I discover something later on that shows him to be utterly distasteful, then, and only then, will I amend my views. But at this point, YOU are the only one being disrespectful by coming on my blog and calling me coward and challenging me to post your comments like you are a five year old in a sandbox daring someone.

You are so incredibly self centered that you can’t see that YOU instigated my reply. I said NOTHING to YOU. I posted a blog. And instead of focusing your comments on the issue at hand, you attacked ME by calling ME a coward. You are the worst kind of hypocrite, one who suffers from selective memory.

Don’t presume to tell me what is mature or immature when you come on my blog calling me a coward. Sweetie? Sweetie is immature? And what is it to call someone a coward and play childish games by saying, ‘I bet you won’t post this.’ You sound like my daughters.

Insincere? You have done nothing to see if I am or not. I have not defended Mark on any of the things you’ve alleged he’s done. I can only take your word for it. But wait, let me guess. Because you are superior to me, YOUR word is gold, right? And your word is the only word I should believe, correct? Who is being insincere now?

Weasel?? There you go again being superior. There is no “weaseling” out of anything. But you wouldn’t know that. A recent study? From whom? Where? The typical biased resources? Look, forward me the information so I can also assess it for its worthiness. Oh but wait, I don’t need to, right? Because you are superior to me and what you tell me is all that matters, and all I can do is try to weasel out of it rather than have intelligent debate with you, or do research, or check history, or read a book, correct? Because I am not capable of intelligent debate, or the aforementioned, right?

There is an old African Proverb that reads: Until the lion writes his own story, the tale of the hunt will always glorify the hunter.

You behave like a hunter who thinks that his story is all that matters, because that story glorifies YOU. Whereas objective people will listen to both stories and then seek out facts based on both arguments.

I must say, good for you that you’ve at LEAST admitted that being Jewish is not a race like so many of your predecessors would wrongly have many believe. That is a step in the right direction.

Look, once again, in this blog post, you expect me to bow to you after you disrespect me. See, the difference between you and I is that I would NEVER simply defend my culture, race, religion or ethnicity just because something grates against my sensibilities. But YOU, without knowing me, defend a possible comment from a Jewish boy, by virtue of the fact that it was from a Jewish boy. But you have YET to address my question, which was, what if the statement were all flowery and sweet? We would not even be having this silly back and forth, now would we?

You blindly defend. You have no discourse, just blind defense where you take it personally that I posted that. And then, you want to behave as though I am the stupid one. If you had simply said that you don’t think a Jewish boy wrote it, and in a level headed manner expressed your OPINION as to why, WITHOUT the attack that followed, then I would have been a bit more accepting.

As for the link you sent me to for Mark’s post, it seems you read with a closed mind and heart. I did not read anything that was not thoroughly reasoned out. His assessment clearly shows a HUGE divide in the way other religions are seen compared to Judaism. When people were disrespecting Islam based on a few radicals, NO ONE defended them. NO ONE in the news said that it was horrible and grossly disrespectful to their religion in general. But when even the smallest, most trivial thing is said about Judaism, heads role, people lose jobs, are killed, ostracized and called anti-Semites. Please. See, this is the reason I respect Mark’s comments. Because whether I agree or not, he has a DISCUSSION. He engages in well reasoned and logical dialogue. He carefully and meticulously shares his thoughts so any reasoned human being can see where he is coming from without even the slightest room for distortion. And he calls it as he sees it. No pretense.

However, some, whom I won’t name, will put on their dark shades, and decided that they will only see those things that grate at their nerves and go against their self righteous sensibilities.

See, the place where Mark and I differ is that I think ALL religions (Christianity, Islam, Judaism, etc.) are the biggest problems in humanity (notice, I don’t BLINDLY defend Mark or anyone else I don’t know—I only base my thoughts on what I read, and I don’t attack him because we disagree on that point). It just so happens that he has eloquently shown how the OTHER religions are fair play for disrespectful media taunts and social disrespect. But NEVER Judaism. Break out the chopping block if someone had done what they did to the Islamic religion in that cartoon. You and I both know that heads would have ROLLED in America!

You KNOW it’s true. And you should stop denying it. It is your sense of privilege under the flag of Judaism why you feel free to say the things you say in the way that you say them. I would almost bet that is why you have not discarded it even though you are an atheist. It is a blanket of protection, because now, if anyone says anything about you, even if they don’t know you’re Jewish, you have the convenience of crying ANTI-SEMITISM, knowing that you would have the media at your feet, stroking your back and saying ‘poor baby, those bad anti-Semites, we’ll destroy them for you.’

And whether you wish to see it or not, people can feel the weight of privilege that surrounds Judaism. People are terrified in public to make any remarks about how Israelis are murdering the Palestinians. Or if they make a small mention of it, they stay away from generalizing and never say the Jews. But it is thick in the air, because who is running the Israeli government?—Japanese? Chinese? French???

Bottom line, what I read on Mark’s blog was far more objective, researched and observant than you saying, a jewish boy didn’t write that. I don’t agree with all his thoughts, particularly those that seem to elevate Christianity above Judaism, especially since Christianity has a horrible history as well. But for the most part, he makes sense, and what he says is true about the privilege that Judaism enjoys while desecrating other’s religions.

And people wonder why I opt for Buddhism.

Zealots really baffle me.
5. pittershawn Says:
April 25th, 2007 at 7:45 pm

Oh my! I forgot to mention one very important thing.

I did NOT judge you based on ANYTHING Mark posted or didn’t post. In fact, I had NO idea that you and he were having discourse until YOU mentioned it, in MY blog, by commenting that that wasn’t a Jewish boy who wrote that and bringing up Mark’s daughter in the process.

When I replied to you, I did not read ANYTHING about you and Mark (your comments to him or his to you). But again, that goes to show that you think I am influenced and couldn’t have possibly had a unique thought on my own—or like a sheep just follow blindly. You are so INCREDIBLY insulting and you can’t even see that. Were it not for you mentioning your discussion with Mark, I would still be clueless about them.

THEREFORE, my response and “judgment” of you was based SOLELY on your condescending response to my blog post. And then when I condescend back, you are pissed. Hypocrite.

You have no behavior and are so blinded by your anger that you can’t even have a civil debate.

ONE ADDITION: As for my assumption about you being of the Khazar line, actually, some assumptions in life can be made based on historical facts (which can be researched and easily produced) and scientific reasoning (which is how all theories are created), even if there are a few cases where it might not be so. But assumptions cannot be made based on NO information, such as the information I lack about Mark’s daughter, which you have yet to produce. Hence, my assumption about your blood line, even if wrong, is a more valid assumption (because I’ve done my research) than the assumptions you are asking me to make about Mark’s daughter, absent any information or research.
6. pittershawn Says:
April 25th, 2007 at 8:16 pm

It just occurred to me why you made that obvious and silly mistake of thinking I judged you based on Mark. I went back to read the post where I got the quote from.

When I first read that post, I did not know WHO he was discoursing with. You automatically made the assumption, by posting on MY blog, that I would know it was you he was talking about. Why on earth would you do something like that? Do you think you are so popular that I would just know who Mark was referring to? You obviously think I have nothing better to do than read and comment on the internecine warfare of bloggers all day.

Now THAT was a silly assumption, especially since I have never had discourse with you to connect the dots (I don’t go around memorizing everyone’s email address). It is only now that I am making the connection by going back to Mark’s blog. ONLY TODAY!!! And only based on your insane assumption that I judged you based on him.

Let me give you some insight. I NEVER have and NEVER will judge anyone based on what ANYONE tells me, or what I read someone sharing about a person. I always go to the source and read from the horses mouth and come to my own conclusions. So trust that anything I have commented on about you, is from me reading YOUR posts/comments and YOUR blog and, sadly, your comments on MY blog.
7. The Atheist Jew Says:
April 25th, 2007 at 8:43 pm

You are a long winded rhetorical know nothing. You know nothing about me. You know nothing about Jews. You don’t have a clue about what a Zionist is. And your Khazar rhetoric is laughable. The Khazar “history” you know about hardly exists in the magnitude you are accepting You are either wilfully ignorant or just an imbecile.

You have a lot of learning to do. It is obvious from reading your emails to me. You are next to clueless. But you don’t even realize it. I’ve spent enough time on email with you fool. And no, calling you a fool has nothing to do with “Jooooish superiority” It has to do with your ignorance.

You are free to engage in debate at either of my blogs
http://www.baconeatingatheistjew.blogspot.com/
or here:
http://www.judeophobewatch.blogspot.com/

In fact, another imbecile brought up Khazars in the comments here:
http://judeophobewatch.blogspot.com/2007/04/judaism-is-nobodys-friend.html

Anyone who can defend Mark Glenn at all after reading his horseshit article about Joooish mentality has to be either a Jooo hater or mentally deficient. Which is it in your case? Actually just answer me on my blog. I’m done with this email nonsense on you. You don’t seem like you even want to learn.

Lets see if you have enough balls “sweetheart” to leave comments on my blogs.